Skip to the questions
← Back to Salem

From reading to better decisions

10 questions to understand your role as a founder right now

Use these AI prompts to examine your strengths, how you work, and what your business needs from you now.

Choose a question
PDF · 12 pages · Arabic + English

Your founder role prompts.

Ten ready-to-copy prompts with practical outputs, reading notes and a context starter. Arabic first, then English.

Loading the form…

Start with the question that matters now

Use real situations and results from your work.

  1. Choose

    Pick the question closest to a decision or challenge you face.

  2. Copy and fill in

    Paste the text into your AI conversation. Fill the brackets with real examples from your work.

  3. Review and try

    Check its reasoning against the evidence. Leave with one action to try this week.

Optional: introduce your business first

Every question works on its own. Use this opening context if you want to explore several in one conversation.

Show the opening context

Help me examine my role as a founder using evidence from my work. Business: [what we offer and to whom]. Current stage: [testing the idea / serving customers and validating demand / expanding an established business]. Team: [size and roles, or solo]. My actual responsibilities: [list]. Most important current challenge: [challenge and evidence]. Available time and resources: [details]. These stage labels are rough context, not a diagnosis. If you need more information, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait for my reply. Separate supported observations from hypotheses to test. Do not invent numbers or infer my personality. Challenge claims that my evidence does not support. Keep outputs concise, specific, and end with one action I can try.

10 questions. A practical result from each.

Open any question to read the prompt. You do not need to work through all ten at once.

What does your business need from you now?

Leave with: One contribution worth your attention over the next 30 days.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business: [offer and customer]. Stage and team: [details]. Three main problems and evidence for each: [list]. My daily work: [main tasks]. Help me identify my most useful contribution over the next 30 days. If information is missing, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait for my reply. Rank three possible contributions by their impact on the most important problem and why they need me. Make one provisional recommendation; state its evidence and the assumption that could change it. End with an outcome to monitor and one action for this week. Do not assume I must personally solve every problem or invent numbers.

Reading behind this question

Managing Oneself · Peter F. Drucker

An application of the contribution question: what does the situation require, and where can you contribute most?

Where do your results show a real strength?

Leave with: Two possible strengths, supporting evidence, and a way to test them.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business, role, and stage: [details]. Five recent work situations: [for each: expected result, what I personally did, actual result, and other people or circumstances that helped]. What possible strengths recur? If detail is missing, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait for my reply. Identify only two candidate strengths. For each, give supporting evidence, a counterexample or missing evidence, and a small task to test it this week. Separate my contribution from the team and circumstances. A result matching a forecast is not sufficient proof of strength, and one success does not establish a permanent trait.

Reading behind this question

Managing Oneself · Peter F. Drucker

Draws on discovering strengths through feedback analysis. Reviewing examples starts the inquiry; it does not replace observation over time.

Under what conditions do you do your best work?

Leave with: One change to your working conditions to test for a week.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business and role: [details]. Three situations where I worked well and three where I struggled: [task, timing, interruptions, working alone or with others, how information was presented, and result]. Find patterns in the working conditions. If information is missing, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait. Give two observations supported by examples, with an alternative explanation for each. Suggest one change to test for a week on a recurring task and how to compare results. Do not assign me a personality type or a fixed learning style. Treat conclusions as hypotheses that may differ by task.

Reading behind this question

Managing Oneself · Peter F. Drucker

Applies the question of how you perform by testing working conditions rather than assigning a fixed label.

What are you unwilling to sacrifice for growth?

Leave with: A clear boundary for a decision you are facing now.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business and role: [details]. Decision and options: [list]. Each option could gain [benefit] and cost [time, money, relationships, or other consequences]. My stated work values are [values]. One time I upheld them and one time I compromised: [examples]. Help clarify the conflict without choosing my values for me. If needed, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait. Return the central tradeoff in each option, one boundary for me to consider, and one question to answer before deciding. Distinguish my stated values from observed actions without judging my personality.

Reading behind this question

Managing Oneself · Peter F. Drucker

Draws on alignment between your values and the work you choose, even when you could succeed at that work.

What should you stop to make room for what matters?

Leave with: One thing to stop, one to defer, and time protected for your priority.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business and stage: [details]. Most important outcome this month: [outcome]. Current commitments and weekly time spent on each: [list]. Work I cannot stop and why: [details]. Help me choose what to leave undone deliberately. If information is missing, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait. Suggest one commitment to stop and one to defer with a review date. Explain the cost of deferring and who needs to know. Calculate available time using only my numbers and propose when to reserve it for my priority. Where value is uncertain, flag work for review rather than automatically removing it.

Reading behind this question

Four Thousand Weeks · Oliver Burkeman

Applies deliberate neglect and protecting time for the things that matter.

What keeps getting delayed because people are waiting for you?

Leave with: A delegation agreement for one task, with clear authority and boundaries.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business, stage, and team: [details, or say solo]. Three tasks delayed until I intervene: [task, why it needs me, possible owner, and consequences of an error]. If needed, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait. Choose one suitable delegation experiment. Write a short agreement: required outcome, owner, decisions they can make independently, time/budget/quality limits, when to escalate, and review date. State the support they need. Do not assume readiness or assign responsibility without authority. If I work alone, propose documenting or simplifying a recurring step without assuming an employee exists.

Reading behind this question

Multipliers · Liz Wiseman

Draws on giving others ownership with support and standards. The agreement format is our own application.

Does your reaction help people tell you the truth?

Leave with: A short conversation script and a clearer agreement with someone you depend on.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business and role: [details]. I work with [employee / partner / freelancer]. Last time they challenged me or shared bad news: [what they said, my exact response, and what happened next]. Our expected outcome and responsibilities were [details]. Review only the reported behavior and words. Do not guess their feelings or treat silence as agreement. If needed, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait. Identify one behavior that may make discussion harder, with an alternative explanation. Write a three-sentence conversation opening, one question inviting their perspective, and one decision or handoff agreement to clarify together.

Reading behind this question

The Fearless Organization · Amy C. Edmondson

Draws on inviting participation and responding productively, alongside Drucker's responsibility for working relationships.

Was it a sound decision, or did you get lucky?

Leave with: A decision record that compares expectations with reality without judging by the outcome alone.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business and stage: [details]. Decision: [describe]. If upcoming, these are my options, available information, and forecast: [details]. If past, this is what I knew and expected then, and what actually happened: [details]. If needed, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait. Create a concise record of options, reason for choosing, observable forecast, assumptions, factors outside my control, and a review date appropriate to when results should appear. For a past decision, separate decision-process quality from the outcome; identify one lesson and missing evidence. Do not rewrite my original forecast with hindsight or treat success alone as proof of good judgment.

Reading behind this question

Managing Oneself + Smart Choices · Peter F. Drucker; John S. Hammond, Ralph L. Keeney & Howard Raiffa

Combines Drucker's feedback analysis with the distinction between decision quality and outcome quality. Drucker suggests reviewing after 9–12 months; this template adapts the date to the decision.

Which part of your role no longer fits this stage?

Leave with: A clearer role draft, one responsibility to take on, and one to hand over.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business: [description]. Changes over the last six months: [customers, team, workload]. My previous role and actual role now: [compare]. Most needed outcome, evidence-backed strengths, and team capabilities: [details]. If needed, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait. Compare current business needs with my responsibilities without assuming growth always requires me to stop hands-on work. Draft my proposed role in two sentences, one responsibility to keep, one to trial handing over, and one capability to learn. Separate evidence from assumptions and end with a signal to monitor for a month to assess whether the change fits.

Reading behind this question

Managing Oneself + Multipliers · Peter F. Drucker; Liz Wiseman

Our application of contribution and building team capability to reviewing a founder's role as circumstances change.

What will you actually change this week?

Leave with: One seven-day experiment, with time reserved, a measure, and a review date.

Read the prompt

Your ready-to-copy prompt

Business, stage, and role: [details]. Main problem and supporting evidence: [details]. Change I am considering: [describe]. Available time and commitments to preserve: [details]. If needed, ask one question at a time, at most three, and wait. Turn this into one seven-day experiment: action, work to reduce to make room, two calendar slots, a small outcome to observe, and a guardrail protecting quality or the team. Use my numbers or leave blanks. Set a review date and specify evidence that would support continuing, changing, or stopping. Do not add a second list of goals or promise a final outcome within a week.

Reading behind this question

Radical Focus · Christina Wodtke

Our application of focusing on outcomes and reviewing weekly. The seven-day experiment is our format, not a personal OKR system prescribed by the book.

The reading behind the questions

Written by Salem Marafi, applying ideas from these books to your role as a founder.

  • Managing OneselfPeter F. Drucker

    March reading: strengths, performance, values, contribution, relationships, and comparing expectations with results.

  • Radical FocusChristina Wodtke

    March reading: fewer priorities, observable outcomes, and a weekly review cadence.

  • MultipliersLiz Wiseman

    May reading: giving people room and genuine ownership, with support and standards.

  • Smart ChoicesJohn S. Hammond, Ralph L. Keeney & Howard Raiffa

    June reading: alternatives, tradeoffs, uncertainty, and distinguishing decision quality from outcome quality.

  • Four Thousand WeeksOliver Burkeman

    July reading: time is finite; choose what to leave undone to protect what matters.

  • The Fearless OrganizationAmy C. Edmondson

    August reading: inviting concerns and responding in ways that support candor and learning.

Created by Salem Marafi from his reading. The prompts and steps are our own applications, not quotations or official tools from the authors. AI outputs are suggestions to check against evidence and experience, not personality assessments or proof of your strengths. Use examples without names or confidential information.